NEWS

TECH ANALYSIS: Mercedes stick to their guns on unique sidepod design with new W14

Mercedes are aiming to bounce back from a tough season last year with the new W14, but a look at their launch car hints that the Silver Arrows have continued with the concept of this car’s unique-looking predecessor. F1 technical expert Mark Hughes examines why…

With their new F1 W14, Mercedes hope they have taken the good bits of last year’s problematical W13 – namely very good high-speed downforce – but eradicated the bouncing and porpoising which so limited its potential and made it such a difficult drive.

READ MORE: Mercedes explain choice of naked carbon for new W14 F1 car

The W14 retains many of the previous car’s highly individualistic details, such as the narrow vertical inlets for the radiators, the extensive area of exposed floor, and the use of the exposed upper ‘sis bar’ (the side impact bar) to direct airflow downwards onto the top of the sidepods.

But the lower sidepod contours have been smoothed out in profile, fattened towards the front and elongated towards the back. The sidepods no longer merge indistinctly with the engine cover but instead are separated by a high cooling cannon which carries the expelled air from the radiators and exits it out the back, either side of the exhaust.

This has reduced the need for the big cooling louvres on the sidepod top (although there is probably the option there to introduce louvres for the hotter races).



sidepod2merc.jpg

W14 (above) and W13 (below) compared. The ‘zero’ sidepod has grown a little, elongated towards the rear and with smoother downward contours at the front. The cooling route for the spent radiator air is now quite different, with a ‘cannon’ section of bodywork between sidepod and engine cover exiting at the back either side of the central exhausts and with less sidepod top louvres.

Technical director Mike Elliott admitted: “Last year there were times when we were questioning ourselves and asking have we made a major mistake, do we need to change what we are fundamentally doing? But you know if you tear it all up and start again, you’re going to start further back than where you are.

“It’s better to take the car you’ve got and build on it. Although we had a lot of problems with the car last year, there was also a lot of goodness in the car, there were things it did well. You have to be careful not to throw those things away by starting again.”

GALLERY: Take a closer look at the Mercedes W14 2023 F1 car and livery

These thoughts were underlined by team boss Toto Wolff: “We have analysed it back and forth and as you can see the sidepods are still very different to any other car. We believe this is not a performance-relative part. Obviously, there is no such thing as a holy cow.

“We are looking at everything. These are the first iteration of the sidepods and after a few races they will probably change a little. But as Mike says, if you change a concept you can end up going three steps backwards to take two forwards. I love the fact that we stayed bold and continued to follow what the science says for us.”



beamcomp.jpg

Front corner of W14 (L) and W13 (R) sidepods compared. The exposed upper side impact beam is used, as before, to direct airflow down to the lower exposed floor, accelerating that airflow and giving it extra energy as it travels to the rear of the car, aiding downforce.

So there has been no switch to the more classic Red Bull bodywork geometry which most teams are now following – nor to the Ferrari’s.

Instead Mercedes have opted for an aerodynamic evolution of their initial response to the ground effect regulations, one which will almost certainly entail an evolved underfloor design too.

But there are significant mechanical changes, which the team hope will get them out of the corner they’d boxed themselves into with last year’s car.

ANALYSIS: Are the ingredients in place for Ferrari to finally bring title glory back to Maranello?

The most significant of these – a completely new rear suspension (albeit still pullrod) – wasn’t really on show at the launch before the car was taken off to Silverstone for its shakedown. But the target was to give the car a bigger range of suspension travel so as to not require the super-stiff settings to stabilise the aero platform, which was a major part of the bouncing problem.

If Mercedes are correct in their assessment that the barriers to solving last year’s aerodynamic difficulties were mechanical, then we should finally see the true potential of this very distinctive aerodynamic concept.



Merc-5.png

W14 front view. The front suspension remains pushrod in its operation but the geometry has been tweaked and the airflow path through there is cleaner.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button